
Currently we are enabling repos irrespective of rpm/deb statement blocks and not failing in the method used if a repository is missing. Downside is - we might be producing one more layer, but it probably is a more logical approach. This is required for adding rpm support in repos.yaml that will also include failing on missing repositories. Change-Id: I5479c5c935760f00fe4cd307366f261deee3199f Signed-off-by: Michal Nasiadka <mnasiadka@gmail.com>
23 lines
563 B
Django/Jinja
23 lines
563 B
Django/Jinja
FROM {{ namespace }}/{{ image_prefix }}base:{{ tag }}
|
|
{% block labels %}
|
|
LABEL maintainer="{{ maintainer }}" name="{{ image_name }}" build-date="{{ build_date }}"
|
|
{% endblock %}
|
|
|
|
{% block hacluster_base_header %}{% endblock %}
|
|
|
|
{% import "macros.j2" as macros with context %}
|
|
|
|
{% if base_package_type =='rpm' %}
|
|
|
|
{{ macros.enable_extra_repos(['hacluster']) }}
|
|
|
|
{% endif %}
|
|
|
|
COPY extend_start.sh /usr/local/bin/kolla_extend_start
|
|
|
|
RUN chmod 644 /usr/local/bin/kolla_extend_start
|
|
|
|
{{ macros.kolla_patch_sources() }}
|
|
|
|
{% block hacluster_base_footer %}{% endblock %}
|